Businesses need to stay on top of their BYOD policies

December 11, 2024

In one way or another, most small to midsize businesses have addressed employees using personal devices for work. In 2022, online career platform Zippia reported that 83% of companies surveyed had a bring your own device (BYOD) policy “of some kind.” That percentage has likely increased as even more businesses have recognized the inherent risks involved.


Does your company have a formal BYOD policy? If not, it probably should. And even if it does, don’t assume the current version will last forever. As technology and its usage evolve, so must your policy.


Anticipate broadly


A formal BYOD policy lays out detailed ground rules for how employees may use their personal devices for work and what role the company will have in supporting, securing and accessing those devices.


Most policies begin with a list of approved devices with acceptable security capabilities that the business can readily support. From there, be sure yours stipulates what happens to your business’s proprietary data on a device if the employee who owns it quits or is terminated. In addition, a policy should anticipate your response if a device winds up in various predicaments, such as it’s:


  • Lost, shared or recycled,
  • Synced on an employee’s personal cloud,
  • Used on unprotected public Wi-Fi networks, and
  • Hacked or otherwise attacked by a virus or malware.


Other issues to address or review include:


Payment or reimbursement. Some companies pay for a predetermined number of voice minutes and provide an unlimited data plan for employees’ phones, either directly or through reimbursements. Any charges above the stated amount of voice minutes are the employee’s responsibility.


Phone numbers. Who owns a mobile phone number is a big deal for some types of employees. Take salespeople, for example. If they leave to work for a competitor, customers may continue to call them — which could lead to lost sales for your business.


Access control. Your policy should require employees to set up their mobile devices to lock when left idle for a few minutes and require a passcode (or facial recognition) to unlock them. Where feasible, ask employees to use multifactor authentication to access certain software or data on your company’s network. This is where users’ personal devices come in handy: They can use their phones, for instance, to verify their identities along with entering a password.


Occasional security checks. Some businesses ask employees to periodically submit their personal devices to the information technology department for security checks that may involve reconfigurations or updates. Alternatively, you could ask only those who handle highly sensitive data to do so.


Address privacy thoroughly


Many employees worry that using personal devices for work gives their employers access to sensitive personal data. Your BYOD policy should state that the company will never view protected information such as:


  • Privileged communications with attorneys,
  • Protected health information, or
  • Complaints against the business that are permitted under the National Labor Relations Act.


Your policy needs to also clarify how data stored on employees’ devices may be gathered if your company becomes involved in a lawsuit. Keep in mind that federal rules governing the production of documents during litigation, including electronically stored information, cover all devices — including personal devices that access a company’s network.


Remain vigilant


The negative financial impact of an outdated, incomplete or nonexistent BYOD policy can be severe. After all, the personal devices of your staff members represent multiple avenues through which hackers, employees or other bad actors could compromise your business’s data or network. Work with your attorney to review your current policy or create one if you haven’t already. Our firm can help you identify and analyze all your technology costs.


© 2024

February 23, 2026
An advance payment is one received by a business before it provides whatever is being paid for. For federal income tax purposes, generally advance payments must be reported as taxable income in the year received. This treatment always applies if your business uses the cash method of accounting for tax purposes. But, if your business uses the accrual method, it may qualify for favorable tax deferral treatment. Tax deferral privilege Accrual-basis businesses can elect to postpone including all or part of an eligible advance payment in taxable income until the year after it’s received. To be eligible for the deferral election, among other requirements, an advance payment must: At least partially be included in revenue for a later year according to your business’s applicable financial statement (AFS) or, if your business doesn’t have an AFS, treated as earned in a later year, and Be received for goods, services or other eligible items listed in IRS guidance. If your accrual-basis business received eligible advance payments in 2025, you potentially can elect to defer reporting some or all of that income until 2026 for federal tax purposes. What is an AFS? An AFS can be an audited financial statement used for credit or financial reporting purposes or certain reports submitted to federal or state agencies. A form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as a 10-K or annual report, also can be an AFS. If your business doesn’t have an AFS and elects to use the deferral method for advance payments, the payment must be included in taxable income in the year received to the extent of the amount that is treated by your business as earned in that year. The remaining portion of the advance payment must be included in taxable income the following year. What types of payments are eligible? Advance payments that may be eligible for deferral include payments for: Services, The sale of goods, Gift cards, The use of intellectual property, The sale or use of computer software, Warranty contracts, and Subscriptions. Other payments specified in IRS guidance also may be eligible. Eligible advance payments don’t include rents (with some exceptions), certain insurance premiums, payments for financial instruments, payments for certain service warranty contracts, and other payments specified in IRS guidance. Some examples The following examples illustrate how eligible advance payments can be deferred for federal income tax purposes: Taxpayer has an AFS. A calendar-year accrual method S corporation provides tennis facilities and lessons. On November 15, 2025, it received payment for a one-year contract for 48 one-hour tennis lessons beginning on that date. Eight lessons were given in 2025. On its AFSs, the business recognizes one-sixth (8/48) of the advance payment as revenue for 2025 and five-sixths (40/48) as revenue for 2026. Making the advance payment deferral method election, the business includes only one-sixth of the advance payment in taxable income for 2025. The remaining five-sixths must be included in taxable income for 2026. Taxpayer doesn’t have an AFS. A calendar-year accrual method LLC provides online security protection services for computers, tablets and cell phones. On September 1, 2025, it received payment for two years of protection services beginning on that date. The business determines that four months of its services should be treated as earned in 2025. Making the advance payment deferral election, the business includes only one-sixth (4/24) of the advance payment in taxable income for 2025. The remaining five-sixths (20/24) must be included in taxable income for 2026. Can you benefit? We’ve only scratched the surface of complicated tax rules and regulations that apply to the treatment of advance payments. Contact us for help determining if your business is eligible to defer 2025 advance payments. We can also calculate the possible current tax savings. © 2026 
February 19, 2026
Choosing an executor is one of the most important decisions in the estate planning process. This person (or institution) will be responsible for carrying out your wishes, managing assets, paying debts and taxes, distributing property to beneficiaries and more. Your first instinct may be to name your spouse, adult child or other close family member as executor. While that decision may feel natural, it’s not always the best choice. Co-appointing a professional advisor alongside a trusted family member can provide a more effective and balanced solution. An executor’s duties Your executor has a variety of important duties, including: Arranging for probate of your will and obtaining court approval to administer your estate (if necessary), Taking inventory of — and collecting, recovering or maintaining — your assets, including life insurance proceeds and retirement plan benefits, Obtaining valuations of your assets where required, Preparing a schedule of assets and liabilities, Arranging for the safekeeping of personal property, Contacting your beneficiaries to advise them of their entitlements under your will, Paying any debts incurred by you or your estate and handling creditors’ claims, Defending your will in the event of litigation, Filing tax returns on behalf of your estate, and Distributing your assets among your beneficiaries according to the terms of your will. For someone without financial, legal or tax expertise, these responsibilities can feel overwhelming — especially while grieving. Even highly capable family members may lack the time or experience needed to administer an estate efficiently. Mistakes can result in delays, disputes or even personal liability. Executors are legally responsible for acting in the best interests of the estate and its beneficiaries. If errors occur — such as missed tax deadlines or improper distributions — the executor may be held accountable. Emotional dynamics can complicate matters When a family member serves as sole executor, emotional tensions can arise. Sibling rivalries, blended family dynamics or disagreements about asset values can quickly escalate. Even when everyone has good intentions, beneficiaries may question decisions about timing, asset sales or expense payments. The executor may feel caught between honoring the deceased’s wishes and preserving family harmony. Needless to say, these situations can strain relationships, sometimes permanently. Two can be better than one A practical alternative is to name both a trusted family member and a professional advisor, such as a CPA, estate planning attorney or corporate fiduciary, as co-executors. This structure can offer several key benefits, such as: Technical expertise. A professional advisor can bring knowledge of tax law, probate procedures, accounting requirements and regulatory compliance. This reduces the risk of costly mistakes and helps ensure deadlines are met. Objectivity. A neutral third party can help mediate disagreements and make decisions based on fiduciary standards rather than emotions. This can protect family relationships and minimize conflict. Shared responsibility. Administering an estate can be time consuming. Dividing responsibilities allows the family member to focus on personal matters while the professional handles technical and administrative tasks. Continuity and stability. If a family member becomes overwhelmed, ill or otherwise unavailable, a professional co-executor can provide continuity. Estates often take months — or even years — to settle. A balanced approach Co-appointing a professional doesn’t mean excluding family involvement. In fact, it often enhances it. The family member remains involved in decision-making and ensures that your personal wishes and family values are honored. Meanwhile, the professional ensures that legal and financial matters are handled efficiently and correctly. For larger or more complex estates — such as those involving business ownership, multiple properties or significant investments — this collaborative model can be especially valuable. Contact us if you have questions about having co-executors or choosing them. © 2026 
February 18, 2026
Pay equity is the philosophy and practice of “equal pay for equal work.” Employers known for fair pay practices stand out in today’s competitive labor market. Fostering pay equity can also help reduce the risk of employment law litigation. But what does pay equity mean in practice? What it does and doesn’t mean First and foremost, pay equity doesn’t mean all employees receive the same amount of compensation. Instead, companies that embrace pay equity make compensation decisions free of unjust biases related to protected characteristics such as age, race, gender, disability, national origin and sexual orientation. Employees’ pay, both when workers are hired and when they receive raises, is determined according to objective, job-related factors, including: Education and training, Experience, Skills, Responsibilities, Performance, and Tenure. Determining whether pay inequities currently exist within your business requires a careful, honest assessment. Many companies conduct a formal pay equity audit. This is a thorough statistical analysis of compensation history, policies and structure. The audit’s objective is to identify any inconsistencies, gaps and incongruities that can’t be explained rationally. Consider these policies If you discover signs of pay inequity in your company, put in place policies to help eliminate them. For example, you might want to use only initials or random ID numbers during early screenings of job candidates, such as resumé reviews. This practice minimizes the chance that hiring managers will distinguish candidates by ethnicity, gender or other protected identities. Also, during candidate interviews, refrain from asking about pay history. Many states and municipalities prohibit such questions, so ask your attorney what applies in your situation. (You might also want to take that opportunity to ensure you understand all antidiscrimination laws that affect hiring decisions.) But even if your state or local law doesn’t forbid past salary questions, it’s a well-established best practice to avoid them. Women and people of color are more likely to have been paid less in their previous positions. By using historical compensation to set their current salaries, you risk compounding pay disparities. More ideas Here are some other ideas that can help your organization achieve pay equity: Set standard pay ranges. Generate objective criteria for recruiting, hiring, compensating, evaluating and promoting employees. Then set standard pay ranges that reflect each position’s value to the business. Avoid individual decision-making. Limit managers’ ability to single-handedly adjust pay for specific employees. These decisions can lead to pay inequities and other problems, such as accusations of favoritism. Provide training. To help managers and supervisors understand pay equity, conduct information sessions. Such training will help them recognize potential issues and discuss compensation with their reports. Prioritize transparency. Let staffers know how you set compensation. Also, reassure them that they can discuss pay with their supervisors without fear of retaliation. Fair work culture The best talent is typically drawn to companies that prioritize employee well-being and cultivate a fair, transparent work culture. Pay equity can help communicate such principles to potential job candidates. Contact us if you’d like help analyzing compensation data or coordinating with legal counsel on a pay equity audit. © 2026 
February 17, 2026
An important decision to make when filing your individual income tax return is whether to claim the standard deduction or itemize deductions. A change under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will make it beneficial for more taxpayers to itemize deductions on their 2025 returns. Specifically, if you paid more than $10,000 in state and local taxes (SALT) last year, you might save tax by itemizing on your 2025 return even if claiming the standard deduction has saved you more tax in recent years. Claiming the standard deduction vs. itemizing Taxpayers can choose to itemize certain deductions on Schedule A or take the standard deduction based on their filing status instead. Itemizing deductions when the total will be larger than the standard deduction saves tax, but it makes filing more complicated. The OBBBA made permanent and, for 2025, slightly increased the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s (TCJA’s) nearly doubled standard deduction for each filing status: $15,750 for single and separate filers, $23,625 for heads of household, and $31,500 for married couples filing jointly. (The new amounts have been adjusted for inflation for 2026 and will continue to be adjusted annually going forward.) Because of the higher standard deduction and the TCJA’s reduction or elimination of many itemized deductions (mostly made permanent by the OBBBA), many taxpayers who once benefited from itemizing have been better off taking the standard deduction for the last several years. If you’re among those taxpayers and you have significant SALT expenses, OBBBA changes could increase your SALT itemized deduction for 2025 enough that your total itemized deductions may exceed your standard deduction, causing itemizing to make sense once again for you. Increased limit on the SALT deduction Deductible SALT expenses include property taxes (for homes, vehicles and boats) and either income tax or sales tax, but not both. Historically, eligible SALT expenses were generally 100% deductible on federal income tax returns if an individual itemized deductions. This provided substantial tax savings to many taxpayers in locations with higher income or property tax rates (or higher home values), as well as those who owned both a primary residence and one or more vacation homes. For 2018 through 2025, the TCJA limited the deduction to $10,000 ($5,000 for married couples filing separately). This SALT cap was scheduled to expire after 2025. Rather than letting the $10,000 cap expire or immediately making it permanent, the OBBBA temporarily quadrupled the limit. Beginning in 2025, taxpayers can deduct up to $40,000 ($20,000 for married couples filing separately), with 1% increases each subsequent year. The $10,000 cap is scheduled to return in 2030. The increased SALT cap could lead to major tax savings compared with the $10,000 cap. For example, a married couple filing jointly in the 32% tax bracket with $40,000 in SALT expenses and MAGI below the threshold for the income-based reduction (see below) could save an additional $9,600 in taxes [32% × ($40,000 − $10,000)]. Reduced limit for higher-income taxpayers While the higher SALT limit is in place, the allowable deduction drops by 30% of the amount by which modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds a threshold amount. For 2025, the threshold is $500,000; when MAGI reaches $600,000, the previous $10,000 cap applies. (These amounts are halved for separate filers.) The MAGI threshold will also increase 1% each year through 2029. Here’s how the earlier example would be different if the taxpayer’s MAGI exceeded the threshold by $20,000: The cap would be reduced by $6,000 (30% × $20,000), leaving a maximum SALT deduction of $34,000 ($40,000 − $6,000). Even reduced, that’s more than three times what would be permitted under the $10,000 cap. The reduced deduction would still save an additional $7,680 in taxes compared to when the $10,000 cap applied [32% × ($34,000 − $10,000)]. Factoring in other itemized deductions Depending on your 2025 SALT expenses, MAGI and filing status, your SALT deduction alone might be enough for your itemized deductions to exceed your standard deduction. If it isn’t, you’ll need to review your other potential itemized deductions and see if all of them, in aggregate, will exceed your standard deduction. Other possible itemized deductions include: Medical expenses. This deduction is limited to the amount of eligible medical expenses that, in aggregate, exceeds 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI). Home mortgage interest. This deduction is available for acquisition debt of up to $750,000. (A $1 million limit still applies to indebtedness incurred on or before December 15, 2017.) Charitable donations. For 2025, cash donations to qualified charities are generally deductible up to 60% of AGI. (Beginning in 2026, the deduction will also be limited to the amount of eligible donations that, in aggregate, exceeds 0.5% of AGI.) Noncash donations may also be deductible, but additional requirements and limits apply. Casualty and theft losses. For 2025, these losses are generally deductible only if they’re due to a disaster declared by the President. (Beginning in 2026, losses due to certain state-declared disasters also will be deductible.) The deduction is limited to the amount of eligible losses that, in aggregate, exceeds 10% of AGI. Keep in mind that additional rules and limits apply to these deductions. A return to itemizing? If you have high SALT expenses but have been claiming the standard deduction in recent years, it’s time to revisit itemizing. A return to itemizing on your 2025 return might save you tax. If you’ve already been itemizing, a larger SALT deduction could also increase your tax savings, perhaps significantly, depending on your SALT expenses, MAGI, filing status and tax bracket. We can assess the impact of the SALT limit increase — and other OBBBA changes — on your tax situation and help ensure you claim all the tax breaks you’re entitled to on your 2025 return. Contact us to set up an appointment. © 2026 
February 17, 2026
The deadlines for filing 2025 tax returns (or extensions) are fast approaching. Although most tax planning moves must be completed by December 31 of the tax year, there are some decisions you can make when filing your return that can save taxes now or in the future. One such decision is whether to claim accelerated depreciation breaks. Depreciation basics For assets with a useful life of more than one year, the cost generally must be depreciated over a period of years (unless accelerated depreciation breaks are available). In other words, taxpayers can deduct only a portion of the asset’s cost each year over the depreciation period. The depreciation period depends on the type of asset, ranging from three years (such as for software and small tools) to 39 years (for commercial real estate). The Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) provides larger deductions in the early years of an asset’s life than the straight-line method. In many cases, assets can be depreciated much more quickly under special tax breaks. Some of these breaks were enhanced by last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). First-year bonus depreciation Under the OBBBA, 100% first-year bonus depreciation can be claimed on 2025 tax returns for qualified assets that were acquired after January 19, 2025, and placed in service in 2025. Eligible assets include: Depreciable personal property, such as equipment, computer hardware and peripherals, Transportation equipment, including certain passenger vehicles, and Commercially available software. First-year bonus depreciation can also be claimed for real estate qualified improvement property (QIP). QIP is defined as an improvement to an interior portion of a nonresidential building placed in service after the date the building was placed in service. However, expenditures attributable to the enlargement of a building, elevators or escalators, or the internal structural framework of a building don’t count as QIP and usually must be depreciated over 39 years. The first-year bonus depreciation percentage is 40% for qualified assets acquired on or before January 19, 2025, and placed in service in 2025. Bonus depreciation is automatically applied to eligible assets unless you elect out of it. However, you can elect out of it only on an asset class basis. For example, you can elect out of it for all three-year property, but you can’t elect out of it for just one specific three-year asset. Section 179 expensing election Sec. 179 expensing allows small businesses to write off the full cost of 2025 eligible assets. For tax years beginning in 2025, the maximum Sec. 179 deduction is $2.5 million (double the pre-OBBBA limit). Eligible assets include: Depreciable personal property, such as equipment, computer hardware and peripherals, Transportation equipment, including certain passenger vehicles, Commercially available software, and Real estate QIP. For nonresidential real property, Sec. 179 deductions are also allowed for qualified expenditures for: Roofs, HVAC equipment, Fire protection and alarm systems, and Security systems. Finally, eligible assets include depreciable personal property used predominantly to furnish lodging, such as furniture and appliances in a property rented to transients. In addition to the annual expense limit, Sec. 179 expensing is subject to a couple of other limits that don’t apply to bonus depreciation. First, the deduction is phased-out dollar for dollar if you put more than $4 million of qualifying assets into service last year. Second, Sec. 179 deductions can’t cause an overall business tax loss. The Sec. 179 deduction limits can be tricky if you own an interest in a pass-through business entity. That said, claiming Sec. 179 expensing can be beneficial for assets not eligible for 100% bonus depreciation or if you want to immediately deduct the cost of some, but not all, assets in a particular asset class that is also eligible for bonus depreciation. Depreciation deduction strategies Claiming the maximum depreciation deductions you can on your 2025 income tax return will generally provide the greatest 2025 tax savings. Among other benefits, this can boost cash flow and provide more funds for further investment in the business. But there are circumstances where it may be better to depreciate assets over a period of years. For example, the Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction for pass-through businesses can be up to 20% of an owner’s QBI. Because of the income limitations on this deduction, claiming big first-year depreciation deductions can reduce QBI and lower or even eliminate your allowable QBI deduction. Depreciating assets over a period of years can also be beneficial if you expect to be subject to higher tax rates in the future, such as if you may be in a higher tax bracket or lawmakers increase rates. When you claim 100% bonus depreciation or Sec. 179 expensing today, you’re eliminating your depreciation deductions for those assets in the future. And deductions save more tax when tax rates are higher. Time to get started We can identify which depreciation breaks you’re eligible for, review your overall tax situation and help determine whether it will be beneficial for you to maximize depreciation-related breaks on your 2025 tax return. We can also strategize with you on tax planning for 2026 asset investments. Please contact us to get started. © 2026 
February 12, 2026
Many people think of estate planning as a “one-and-done” task — something you complete and file away. But an estate plan should evolve as your life and finances and relevant laws change. An outdated plan can create confusion, unintended tax consequences or outcomes that no longer reflect your wishes. The higher federal gift and estate tax exemption that was made permanent by last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act is one reason to review your estate plan now. But you should also review your plan whenever something significant changes in your life. Let’s take a look at common situations that signal the need to revisit your will, trusts, powers of attorney or other estate planning documents. Major life events Life transitions are the most common reasons estate plans need attention. Marriage or remarriage is a big one, especially if you have children from a prior relationship. Divorce is equally important. Failing to update your documents could leave an ex-spouse in control of your assets or medical decisions. The birth or adoption of a child or grandchild should also trigger a review. You’ll want to name a guardian or adjust beneficiary designations to reflect your growing family. Similarly, the death or incapacity of a spouse, beneficiary, trustee or executor means your plan may no longer function as intended. Financial changes matter, too Your estate plan should reflect your current financial situation. If your net worth has increased significantly — through business growth, inheritance, real estate appreciation or investment success — your existing plan may not adequately address tax planning or asset protection. Starting, buying or selling a business is another major reason to update your estate plan. Business ownership often requires specific provisions for succession planning, valuation and continuity. Retirement also can prompt changes, as income sources shift and distribution strategies evolve. Don’t forget supporting documents Updating an estate plan isn’t just about your will or trusts. Beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and life insurance policies should be reviewed regularly, as they generally override what’s stated in your will. Powers of attorney and health care directives are also critical to review. Make sure they continue to reflect your wishes and that those you’re providing with decision-making authority are still people you trust and who are able to serve. The bottom line An estate plan is only effective if it reflects your current wishes and circumstances, as well as current law. Regular reviews help ensure your assets are distributed as intended, your loved ones are protected, and unnecessary taxes or legal complications are avoided. Because estate planning intersects with taxes, financial planning and your long-term goals, it’s wise to review your plan with qualified professionals. We can help you identify when updates may be needed and coordinate with your legal and financial advisors to keep your plan on track. © 2026 
By Kayla Kanetake February 11, 2026
As remote and hybrid work have become more common, corporate retreats have surged in recent years. Some or all of your employees may now work from home and experience little in-person interaction with coworkers. A retreat can foster collegial relationships and, ultimately, greater productivity. But the first decision you’ll likely need to make is whether your retreat will be a smaller-scale affair held in your office or an off-site retreat. There are ways to make either one affordable. Your office Staying on your company’s premises can keep out-of-pocket costs in check. The most obvious is that you won’t need to rent meeting rooms. And, assuming employees live in the area, you won’t have transportation and lodging expenses. You’ll also likely spend less on food and beverages. A local restaurant can cater your meals and snacks, and you could buy beverages in bulk. On the downside, employees tend to view on-site retreats as just another day at the office. This can hamper creative thinking and team building and limit possible activities. Worse, employees may be distracted if they can frequently run back to their desks to check email and voicemail. Off-site locations In general, workers are better able to focus on a retreat agenda at an off-site location. They’re in a new, “special” environment with no visual cues to trigger workday routines. So, even though you’ll incur greater costs than if you’d stayed in your office, you may get a better return on investment. The fact is, hotels and other facilities that host company retreats need and want your business! Many things may be negotiable, and you might be able to snag discounts by booking or paying early. Get several quotes and compare prices and services. You’ll have more leverage if you avoid scheduling your retreat during seasonal peaks when local venues tend to be busy with weddings, trade shows and industry conferences. Hotels earn their biggest margins on food, beverages and meeting setup fees, so they may be willing to provide complimentary or discounted rooms for guest speakers and out-of-town employees. Also, try to negotiate a flat food-and-beverage price for the entire retreat, rather than a per-person or per-event rate. Possible tax relief Here’s another way to save: Some of your company retreat expenses may be tax-deductible. They need to meet IRS criteria as “ordinary and necessary” business expenses and can’t be extravagant or include expenditures for employees’ spouses. In general, business meals are only 50% deductible, and entertainment costs are nondeductible. Contact us to learn more about tax-deductible costs and the IRS’s documentation requirements. © 2026 
February 10, 2026
Married couples have a choice when filing their 2025 federal income tax returns. They can file jointly or separately. What you choose will affect your standard deduction, eligibility for certain tax breaks, tax bracket and, ultimately, your tax liability. Which filing status is better for you depends on your specific situation. Minimizing tax In general, you should choose the filing status that results in the lowest tax. Typically, filing jointly will save tax compared to filing separately. This is especially true when the spouses have different income levels. Combining two incomes can bring some of the higher-earning spouse’s income into a lower tax bracket. Also, some tax breaks aren’t available to separate filers. The child and dependent care credit, adoption expense credit, American Opportunity credit and Lifetime Learning credit are available to married couples only on joint returns. And some of the new tax deductions under 2025’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) aren’t available to separate filers. These include the qualified tips deduction, the qualified overtime deduction and the senior deduction. You also may not be able to deduct IRA contributions if you or your spouse were covered by an employer-sponsored retirement plan such as a 401(k) and you file separate returns. And you can’t exclude adoption assistance payments or interest income from Series EE or Series I savings bonds used for higher education expenses if you file separately. However, there are cases when married couples may save taxes by filing separately. An example is when one spouse has significant medical expenses. Medical expenses are deductible only to the extent they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI). If a medical expense deduction is claimed on a spouse’s separate return, that spouse’s lower separate AGI, as compared to the higher joint AGI, can result in a larger total deduction. Couples who got married in 2025 If you got married anytime in 2025, for federal tax purposes you’re considered to have been married for all of 2025 and must file either jointly or separately. And married filing separately status isn’t the same as single filing status. So you can’t assume that filing separately for 2025 will produce similar tax results to what you and your spouse each experienced for 2024 filing as singles, even if nothing has changed besides your marital status — especially if you have high incomes. The income ranges for the lower and middle tax brackets and the standard deductions are the same for single and separate filers. But the top tax rate of 37% kicks in at a much lower income level for separate filers than for single filers. So do the 20% top long-term capital gains rate, the 3.8% net investment income tax and the 0.9% additional Medicare tax. Alternative minimum tax (AMT) risk can also be much higher for separate filers than for singles. Liability considerations If you and your spouse file a joint return, each of you is “jointly and severally” liable for the tax on your combined income. And you’re both equally liable for any additional tax the IRS assesses, plus interest and most penalties. That means the IRS can come after either of you to collect the full amount. Although there are “innocent spouse” provisions in the law that may offer relief, they have limitations. Therefore, even if a joint return results in less tax, some people may still choose to file separately if they want to be responsible only for their own tax. This might occur when a couple is separated. Many factors These are only some of the factors to consider when deciding whether to file jointly or separately. Contact us to discuss the many factors that may affect your particular situation. © 2026 
February 9, 2026
Tax credits reduce tax liability dollar-for-dollar. As a result, they can be more valuable than deductions, which reduce only the amount of income subject to tax. One tax credit that hasn’t been getting much attention lately but that can still be valuable for some small businesses is the credit for providing health insurance to employees. Who’s eligible? Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), certain small employers that provide employees with health care coverage are eligible for this tax credit. Although it’s been available for more than a decade and generally can be claimed for only two years, some small businesses may still be eligible. These may include newer businesses as well as older ones that only recently have begun offering health insurance. The maximum credit is 50% of group health coverage premiums paid by the employer, if it contributes at least 50% of the total premium or of a benchmark premium. For 2025, the full credit is available for employers with 10 or fewer full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) and average annual wages of $33,300 or less per employee. Partial credits are available on a sliding scale to businesses with fewer than 25 FTEs and average annual wages of less than $66,600. (These amounts are annually adjusted for inflation and increase to $34,100 and $68,200, respectively, for 2026.) As noted, the credit can be claimed for only two years. Also, those years must be consecutive. (Credits claimed before 2014 don’t count, however.) If you started offering employee health insurance in 2025, you may be eligible for the credit on your 2025 return (and again on your 2026 return next year). If you’re offering coverage beginning in 2026, you may be able to claim the credit when you file your 2026 return next year (and then again on your 2027 return the following year). Keep in mind that additional rules apply to the health care coverage credit. But premiums that aren’t eligible for the credit generally can be deducted, subject to the rules that apply to deductions for ordinary business expenses. Can your business claim the credit? If you’re not sure whether your business is eligible for a full (or partial) credit for health care coverage, contact us. We can help assess your eligibility. We can also advise on whether you may be eligible for other tax credits on your 2025 return and if you can take any steps this year so you can potentially claim credits on your 2026 return next year. © 2026 
February 5, 2026
Irrevocable trusts provide various estate planning benefits, such as reducing estate taxes and helping to ensure assets are distributed as you wish. But estate planning isn’t a “set it and forget it” process. Families, tax laws and financial circumstances can change. A major downside of irrevocable trusts is that they’re difficult to update once they’ve been signed and funded. That’s where trust decanting can help. What does it mean to “decant” a trust? The term decanting comes from pouring wine from one bottle to another. In estate planning, it means transferring assets from an existing trust to a new trust that can better achieve your goals. Depending on the trust’s language and the provisions of applicable state law, decanting may allow a trustee to: Correct errors or clarify trust language, Move the trust to a state with more favorable tax or asset protection laws, Take advantage of new tax laws, Remove beneficiaries, Change the number of trustees or alter their powers, Add or enhance spendthrift language to protect the trust assets from creditors’ claims, or Move funds to a special needs trust for a disabled beneficiary. Unlike assets transferred at death, assets that are transferred to a trust don’t receive a step-up in basis. As a result, they can subject the beneficiaries to capital gains tax on any appreciation in value. One potential solution is to use decanting. Decanting can authorize the trustee to confer a general power of appointment over the assets to the trust’s grantor. This would cause the assets to be included in the grantor’s estate and, therefore, to be eligible for a step-up in basis. Depending on the size of the estate, this might make sense given today’s high gift and estate tax exemption ($15 million in 2026). Beware of your state’s laws Many states have decanting statutes, and in some states, decanting is authorized by common law. Either way, it’s critical to understand your state’s requirements. For example, in certain states, the trustee must notify the beneficiaries or even obtain their consent to decant. Even if decanting is permitted, there may be limitations on its uses. Some states, for example, prohibit the use of decanting to eliminate beneficiaries or add a power of appointment. And most states won’t allow the addition of a new beneficiary. If your state doesn’t authorize decanting, or if its decanting laws don’t allow you to accomplish your objectives, it may be possible to move the trust to a state whose laws meet your needs. Don’t forget about potential tax implications One of the risks associated with decanting is uncertainty over its tax implications. For example, let’s say a beneficiary’s interest is reduced. Has he or she made a taxable gift? Does it depend on whether the beneficiary has consented to the decanting? If the trust’s language authorizes decanting, must it be treated as a grantor trust? Does such language jeopardize the trust’s eligibility for the marital deduction? Does distribution of assets from one trust to another trigger capital gains or other income tax consequences to the trust or its beneficiaries? If you have tax-related questions, please contact us. We’d be pleased to help you better understand the pros and cons of decanting a trust. © 2026